Card #1785
Theatrical
Is it necessarily a bad thing if a protocol optimizes a little bit for being theatrical? Thinking about Bitcoin's sudden halvings every 4 years, as opposed to the smooth exponential decay curve that a mathematician would have made.
- Quote
- 2.91%
- Palette
- Calm Coastline
- Direction
- Horizontal
- Phase
- Resolution
- Icons
- 0
1 in 34
1 in 7
1 in 4
positional, not random
the miner's 1st card, not random
1 in 918 · rank 1,055/2,015
- Owner
- 0xa686…d733
held since Dec 23, 2023
- Mint
- 0x90b3…069c
Dec 1, 2023 · 0.212 ETH fee · 6,666 bytes
Market
Loading…
What am I looking at?
Provenance
- Miner
- 0x90b3…069c
- Mint transaction
- 0x6d32…8973 ↗
- Block & date
- 18,693,174 · Dec 1, 2023
- Payload
card payload: 6,666 bytes
collection payload at mint: 11,690,123 bytes (on-chain payload progress 88.52%)
- Chunk kind
jpeg
this card's payload is part of the progressive JPEG scan.
- SSTORE2 pointer
- 0x6713…3f59 ↗
- Visible since
- this card's image completed when card #1798 was mined
- Seeds
on-chain seed 1185518468
render seed 59795624484 (drifted 32 PRNG calls, quirk of the viewer)
Activity
Live activity
Loading…
On-chain transfers
- Mint 0x0000…0000 → 0x90b3…069cDec 1, 2023
- Transfer 0x90b3…069c → 0xa686…d733Dec 23, 2023
Comments
Loading comments…
Verify
Every fact above is reproducible straight from the chain: no trust required.
