Card #1742
Theatrical
Is it necessarily a bad thing if a protocol optimizes a little bit for being theatrical? Thinking about Bitcoin's sudden halvings every 4 years, as opposed to the smooth exponential decay curve that a mathematician would have made.
- Quote
- 2.91%
- Palette
- Mystic Blossoms
- Direction
- Diagonal
- Phase
- Resolution
- Icons
- 2
1 in 34
1 in 11
1 in 2
positional, not random
the miner's 6th card, not random
1 in 765 · rank 1,297/2,015
- Owner
- 0x9142…5116
held by its miner since mint (Dec 1, 2023)
- Mint
- 0x9142…5116
Dec 1, 2023 · 0.200 ETH fee · 6,522 bytes
Market
Loading…
What am I looking at?
Provenance
- Miner
- 0x9142…5116
- Mint transaction
- 0x33b0…2813 ↗
- Block & date
- 18,693,154 · Dec 1, 2023
- Payload
card payload: 6,522 bytes
collection payload at mint: 11,407,403 bytes (on-chain payload progress 86.38%)
- Chunk kind
jpeg
this card's payload is part of the progressive JPEG scan.
- SSTORE2 pointer
- 0x5766…7713 ↗
- Visible since
- this card's image completed when card #1769 was mined
- Seeds
on-chain seed 4240509794
render seed 59187484184 (drifted 30 PRNG calls, quirk of the viewer)
Activity
Live activity
Loading…
On-chain transfers
- Mint 0x0000…0000 → 0x9142…5116Dec 1, 2023
Comments
Loading comments…
Verify
Every fact above is reproducible straight from the chain: no trust required.